Contribution Analysis
Contribution analysis is a theory-based evaluation approach that addresses the attribution problem — establishing whether and how an intervention made a difference — without relying on an experimental counterfactual. Developed by John Mayne from 2001 onward, it works by articulating the program's theory of change, gathering evidence along that chain, and then assembling a 'contribution story' that is progressively stress-tested against rival explanations. The aim is not statistical attribution but a credible, evidence-based conclusion that the program plausibly contributed to observed results, in the face of other influencing factors.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280. DOI: 10.1177/1356389012451663 ↗
- Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1), 1–24. DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.016.001 ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Contribution Analysis for Causal Inference in Program Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/public-policy/contribution-analysis
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
- Theory of Change EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →