Impact Evaluation Design
Impact evaluation design is the upstream task of structuring an evaluation so that it can credibly attribute changes in outcomes to a policy or program rather than to other factors. Its defining concern is the counterfactual: what would have happened to participants in the absence of the intervention. Codified in resources such as the World Bank's Impact Evaluation in Practice, the design process selects an identification strategy — randomised assignment, or a quasi-experimental method such as difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, instrumental variables or matching — that constructs a valid comparison and yields an unbiased estimate of the intervention's effect.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN: 9781464807794
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Impact Evaluation Design for Causal Attribution of Policy Effects. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/public-policy/impact-evaluation-design
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Kontrafaktisk effektvurdering (CIE)Kausal inferens↔ sammenlign
- Difference-in-Differences (Diff-in-Diff)Økonometri↔ sammenlign
- Regression Discontinuity in Policy EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →