ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineCitizen-state interaction studies

Administrative Burden Analysis

Administrative burden analysis examines the costs that individuals experience when they interact with the state to claim benefits, comply with obligations or access public services. Articulated by Donald Moynihan, Pamela Herd and Hope Harvey in their influential 2015 article, the framework decomposes these costs into three types: learning costs of finding out about and understanding a program, psychological costs of stress and stigma, and compliance costs of the time, paperwork and effort required to participate. The central claim is that burdens are consequential — they suppress program take-up and access — and that they are often the product of political choices rather than mere administrative accident. The analysis makes these hidden costs visible and traces who bears them.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muu009

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Administrative Burden Analysis of Citizen-State Interactions. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/public-administration/administrative-burden-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateAdministrative Burden Analysis (Administrative Burden Analysis of Citizen-State Interactions). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/public-administration/administrative-burden-analysis · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026