Wordfish Scaling
Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x ↗
- Lowe, W., & Benoit, K. (2013). Validating Estimates of Latent Traits from Textual Data Using Human Judgment as a Benchmark. Political Analysis, 21(3), 298–313. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt002 ↗
- Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps028 ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Wordfish Scaling of Political Texts (Unsupervised Position Estimation). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/wordfish-scaling
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Ideal Point EstimationPolitical Science↔ sammenlign
- Manifesto CodingPolitical Science↔ sammenlign
- WordfishPsykometri↔ sammenlign
- WordscoresPsykometri↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →