ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineText-as-data / content analysis

Dictionary-Based Text Analysis

Dictionary-based text analysis scores documents by counting how often they use words from a predefined, validated list — a dictionary or lexicon — tied to a concept such as sentiment, emotion, or a policy area. Each document's score is essentially the rate at which dictionary terms appear, so a corpus of speeches, news articles, or manifestos can be measured for tone or thematic emphasis quickly and transparently. It is the simplest and most interpretable family of automated content-analysis methods, and Grimmer and Stewart treat it as a baseline against which more elaborate text-as-data tools are judged.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps028
  2. Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012). Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts. Political Communication, 29(2), 205–231. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2012.671234

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Dictionary-Based (Lexicon) Text Analysis for Political Texts. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/dictionary-based-text-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateDictionary-Based Text Analysis in Politics (Dictionary-Based (Lexicon) Text Analysis for Political Texts). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/dictionary-based-text-analysis · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026