Political Ideology Scaling
Political ideology scaling estimates actors' positions on one or more latent ideological dimensions from their observed choices, most often legislators' roll-call votes, but also survey responses and donations. The dominant methods are Poole and Rosenthal's NOMINATE (1985) and the Bayesian item-response-theory (IRT) approach of Clinton, Jackman and Rivers (2004), which place legislators and the proposals they vote on in a common spatial map.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357-384. DOI: 10.2307/2111172 ↗
- Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355-370. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404001194 ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Ideal Point Estimation and Political Ideology Scaling. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-psychology/political-ideology-scaling
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Candidate Evaluation ModelPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Ideological Constraint AnalysisPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Political Ideology ScalePolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Political Sophistication MeasurementPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →