ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Territorial Conflict Analysis×Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis×
FagområdeInternational RelationsInternational Relations
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår20011996
OphavspersonTerritorial-explanation-of-war program (John Vasquez; Paul Huth)Daniel Jones, Stuart Bremer & J. David Singer (Correlates of War project)
TypeObservational analysis of disputed-issue type and warCoding and statistical analysis of interstate militarized confrontations
Oprindelig kildeVasquez, J., & Henehan, M. T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138. DOI ↗Jones, D. M., Bremer, S. A., & Singer, J. D. (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), 163–213. DOI ↗
AliasserTerritorial Dispute Analysis, Territorial Explanation of War, Territory and Conflict Analysis, Border Dispute AnalysisMID Analysis, Militarized Dispute Coding, Correlates of War Dispute Analysis, Dyadic Conflict Onset Analysis
Relaterede33
ResuméTerritorial conflict analysis tests the proposition — central to the 'territorial explanation of war' — that what states fight over matters, and that disputes over territory are especially war-prone. Vasquez and Henehan (2001) operationalize this by coding disputes for the issue at stake (territory, policy, regime) and comparing how often each type escalates to war. The consistent finding that territorial disputes are more likely to lead to war than other kinds reframes the study of conflict around the contested issue rather than only the attributes of the disputants.Militarized interstate dispute (MID) analysis is the coding and quantitative study of confrontations in which one state threatens, displays, or uses military force against another. Built on the Correlates of War project's MID dataset and the coding rules codified by Jones, Bremer, and Singer (1996), it provides the standard observational measure of interstate conflict short of and including war, structured as dyad-years so that the onset, escalation, and outcomes of disputes can be modeled statistically across two centuries of the international system.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Territorial Conflict Analysis · Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis. Hentet 2026-06-25 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare