ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Avaluació de polítiques mitjançant puntuació de propensió×Emparellament per puntuació de propensió×
CampInferència causalEstadística per a la recerca
FamíliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19971983
Autor originalRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipusQuasi-experimental matching estimatorMethod
Font seminalRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
ÀliesPSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionats63
ResumPolicy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperat el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare