ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Emparellament dinàmic de puntuacions de propensió×Ponderació per puntuació de propensió (PSW / IPW)×
CampInferència causalInferència causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Any d'origen1986-20101983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipusSequential causal matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Font seminalLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Àliesdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionats66
ResumDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperat el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare