Comparative Historical Analysis
Comparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.
اقرأ الطريقة كاملة
سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.
خريطة المناهج
محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.
المصادر
- Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452
- Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521294997
كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis
أيُّ منهج؟
ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.
- Most Different Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ قارن
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ قارن
- تتبع العمليات (Process Tracing)القياس النفسي↔ قارن
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ قارن