GE-McKinsey Nine-Box Matrix
The GE-McKinsey nine-box matrix is a multifactor portfolio-analysis tool that positions a company's business units in a three-by-three grid defined by two composite dimensions: the attractiveness of the industry the unit competes in, and the unit's competitive strength within it. Developed by General Electric with McKinsey & Company in the early 1970s as a richer alternative to the BCG growth-share matrix, it replaces single proxies (market growth and relative share) with weighted indices built from many underlying factors. Hax and Majluf's 1983 Interfaces article gave the matrix a systematic methodological treatment, and Wind, Mahajan, and Swire's 1983 Journal of Marketing study empirically compared it with other standardized portfolio models, showing how much business positions depend on model choice. The nine cells map onto invest-grow, selectivity, and harvest-divest zones that guide resource allocation.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Hax, A. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1983). The Use of the Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Matrix in Strategic Planning. Interfaces, 13(2), 54-71. DOI: 10.1287/inte.13.2.54 ↗
- Wind, Y., Mahajan, V., & Swire, D. J. (1983). An Empirical Comparison of Standardized Portfolio Models. Journal of Marketing, 47(2), 89-99. DOI: 10.1177/002224298304700209 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). GE-McKinsey Nine-Box Matrix (Industry Attractiveness-Business Strength Portfolio). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/strategic-management/ge-mckinsey-matrix
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- BCG Growth-Share Matrix战略管理↔ 比较
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)战略管理↔ 比较
- Porter's Five Forces Industry Analysis战略管理↔ 比较
- Strategic Value Chain Analysis战略管理↔ 比较