ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineSociology of religion / survey methodology

National Congregations Study Method

The National Congregations Study (NCS) method solves a hard sampling problem: there is no complete list of all the congregations in a country, so they cannot be sampled directly. Mark Chaves and colleagues addressed this with hypernetwork (multiplicity) sampling - drawing a representative sample of individuals, asking those who attend services to name their congregation, and treating each named congregation as a sampled unit. Because a congregation is named in proportion to the number of people who attend it, this procedure automatically yields a sample of congregations with probability proportional to size, from which leaders are then interviewed. First fielded in 1998 and described in the 1999 Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion article, and repeated in later waves summarized in Chaves and Eagle's 2015 report, the NCS has become the standard way to produce nationally representative data on American congregations.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Chaves, M., Konieczny, M. E., Beyerlein, K., & Barman, E. (1999). The National Congregations Study: Background, Methods, and Selected Results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(4), 458-476. DOI: 10.2307/1387606
  2. Chaves, M., & Eagle, A. (2015). Religious Congregations in 21st Century America. Durham, NC: Department of Sociology, Duke University (National Congregations Study). link

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). National Congregations Study Method (Hypernetwork Sampling of Congregations). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/sociology-of-religion/national-congregations-study

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateNational Congregations Study Method (National Congregations Study Method (Hypernetwork Sampling of Congregations)). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/sociology-of-religion/national-congregations-study · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026