ScholarGate
助手

Phrase Structure Rules

Phrase structure rules are rewrite rules that specify how a syntactic category can be expanded into a sequence of constituents, generating the hierarchical structure of sentences.

用 PaperMind 寻找选题即将推出Find papers & topics
Tools & resources
下载幻灯片
Learn & explore
视频即将推出

Definition

A phrase structure rule is a rewrite rule of the form 'A goes to B C', stating that a constituent of category A can consist of constituents B and C, so that a set of such rules generates the well-formed hierarchical structures of a language.

Scope

This topic covers phrase structure (rewrite) rules: their form and function, the context-free grammars they define, their role in generating constituent structure together with the lexicon, and their eventual replacement by general schemata and operations. It does not cover the X-bar generalisation, constituency diagnostics, or movement, which are treated in sibling topics.

Core questions

  • How do rewrite rules generate hierarchical sentence structure?
  • What kind of grammar do phrase structure rules define?
  • How do phrase structure rules interact with the lexicon?
  • Why were construction-specific rules replaced by general principles?

Key concepts

  • rewrite rule
  • context-free grammar
  • phrase marker
  • recursion
  • lexical insertion
  • subcategorisation

Key theories

Phrase structure grammar
Chomsky's formalisation of constituent structure as a set of rewrite rules defining a context-free grammar that pairs sentences with hierarchical phrase markers.
Rules plus lexical insertion
The Aspects model in which phrase structure rules generate a categorial skeleton into which lexical items are inserted according to their subcategorisation properties.

History

Phrase structure rules were introduced in Chomsky (1957) as the base component of a generative grammar, drawing on the formal notion of rewrite systems. The Aspects model (1965) coupled them with a lexicon and lexical insertion. As the redundancy between construction-specific rules and general patterns became clear, the field moved toward the X-bar schema and, later, toward deriving structure from the operation Merge, largely eliminating language-particular phrase structure rules.

Debates

Adequacy of context-free phrase structure
Whether context-free phrase structure rules suffice to describe natural-language syntax, or whether transformations and additional mechanisms are required to capture displacement and long-distance dependencies.

Key figures

  • Noam Chomsky
  • Andrew Carnie
  • Emil Post

Related topics

Seminal works

  • chomsky1957
  • chomsky1965
  • carnie2013

Frequently asked questions

What does a phrase structure rule look like?
A typical rule is 'S goes to NP VP', meaning a sentence consists of a noun phrase followed by a verb phrase. Sets of such rules build up nested tree structures for whole sentences.
Are phrase structure rules still used?
In their original construction-specific form they have largely been replaced by general schemata like X-bar theory and by the operation Merge in minimalist syntax, though context-free style rules remain useful in computational and pedagogical settings.

Methods for this concept

Related concepts