Conjoint Survey Experiment
A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt024 ↗
- Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015). Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments against Real-World Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395–2400. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112 ↗
- Leeper, T. J., Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2020). Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 207–221. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2019.30 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Conjoint Survey Experiment (Causal Conjoint Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-science/conjoint-survey-experiment
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- 联合分析实验设计↔ 比较
- Factorial Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比较
- Survey ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比较
- Vignette ExperimentPolitical Science↔ 比较