Responding to Peer Reviewer Comments
A response to reviewers (or 'revision letter') is a formal document that authors submit alongside a revised manuscript, addressing each reviewer comment point-by-point. The response letter shows the editor and reviewers that you have carefully considered their feedback, explained changes made in light of their suggestions, and justified any points of disagreement. A thoughtful, respectful response to reviewers significantly increases the likelihood of acceptance; a dismissive or defensive response can lead to rejection despite good science. The response letter is not an argument but a demonstration of engagement, transparency, and scientific integrity.
源记录
引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。
- Clydesdale, G. J., Seymour, K. J., & Toy, M. S. (2013). How to write a response to reviewers. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97(1), 1–2. · URL
- Wager, E., & Wieland, B. (2011). Responsibilities of journal editors. Lancet, 337(9834), 1807–1809. · URL
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. · URL
精选声明
声明已持久化到证据分类账中,每个声明都有自己的评估。
当分类账中没有声明时,此视图不会自行创建声明评估。
相关方法
从方法图中生成,显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。