ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineresults-reporting

统计报告标准:分析的透明报告

透明地报告统计结果——包括效应量、置信区间、p值和假设——对于科学诚信和可重复性至关重要。许多已发表的研究仅报告p值,而没有效应量或置信区间,这使得读者无法评估研究结果的量级。Cumming (2013)、美国统计协会和ICMJE强调的统计报告标准,要求报告效应量、置信区间,并讨论不确定性。这使得读者能够判断研究结果是否具有实际意义(而不仅仅是统计学意义),并能够在荟萃分析中比较不同研究的效应量。糟糕的统计报告会浪费研究资源,并阻碍对证据的适当综合。

用 PaperMind 寻找选题即将推出视频即将推出下载幻灯片

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Cumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613504966
  2. Fidler, F., Thomason, N., Cumming, G., Finch, S., & Leeman, J. (2005). Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychological Science, 15(2), 119–126. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502008.x
  3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Guidelines for Reporting Statistical Analyses and Results. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/academic-writing/statistical-reporting-standards

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateStatistical Reporting Standards (Guidelines for Reporting Statistical Analyses and Results). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/academic-writing/statistical-reporting-standards · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026