方法证据记录
Network Meta-Analysis
Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.
源记录
引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。
Network Meta-Analysis (NMA)
分类方法记录 · process-pipeline / evidence-synthesis
- Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. · DOI 10.1002/sim.1201
- Bucher, H. C., Guyatt, G. H., Griffith, L. E., & Walter, S. D. (1997). The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(6), 683–691. · DOI 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00049-8
- Dias, S., Welton, N. J., Caldwell, D. M., & Ades, A. E. (2010). Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 29(7–8), 932–944. · DOI 10.1002/sim.3767
精选声明
声明已持久化到证据分类账中，每个声明都有自己的评估。
尚无精选声明
当分类账中没有声明时，此视图不会自行创建声明评估。
相关方法
从方法图中生成，显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。