Randomization Test for Single-Case Designs
The randomization test for single-case experimental designs is a permutation-based procedure that yields a valid statistical p-value for an intervention effect in a single participant, provided that some experimentally controllable feature of the design — typically the moment the intervention begins or the order in which conditions are presented — was randomly determined before data were collected. Eugene Edgington showed in 1980 that this design-embedded randomization is what licenses inference: because the random assignment is the source of the test's probability statements, the procedure draws valid conclusions without assuming that the data are normally distributed or serially independent, two assumptions that single-case time-series data routinely violate. Edgington and Onghena's monograph established the modern framework, in which the observed test statistic is referred to the distribution of statistics generated by every admissible re-assignment of the data. In disability research, where interventions are often delivered to one person at a time and group designs are impractical, the randomization test provides a defensible significance test that complements visual analysis.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Edgington, E. S. (1980). Validity of Randomization Tests for One-Subject Experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5(3), 235-251. DOI: 10.3102/10769986005003235 ↗
- Edgington, E. S., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization Tests (4th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. ISBN: 9781584885894
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Randomization Test for Single-Case Experimental Designs (Edgington Permutation Inference). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/disability-studies/randomization-test-single-case
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Single-Case Experimental DesignDisability Studies↔ 比较
- Standardized Mean Difference for Single-Case DesignsDisability Studies↔ 比较