ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Wells DVT评分×CURB-65肺炎严重程度评分×
领域临床评估临床评估
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19942003
提出者Philip S. WellsW. Staniford Lim, et al.
类型Venous thromboembolism risk stratificationCommunity-acquired pneumonia severity assessment
开创性文献Wells, P. S., Hirsh, J., Anderson, D. R., et al. (1994). A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154(13), 1541-1546. link ↗Lim, W. S., van der Eerden, M. M., Laing, R., et al. (2003). Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax, 58(5), 377-382. DOI ↗
别名Wells DVT Score, DVT WellsCURB-65, Pneumonia severity
相关33
摘要The Wells score, developed by Wells et al. in 1994, is a clinical prediction rule that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It combines seven clinical features to guide diagnostic testing decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging in suspected DVT patients.CURB-65, derived and validated by Lim et al. in 2003, is a 5-point severity of illness score for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It assesses confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years to stratify mortality risk and guide admission and treatment decisions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Wells Score for DVT · CURB-65 Pneumonia Severity Score. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare