方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于VOSviewer的科学制图× | 共被引分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 文献计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010 | 1973 |
| 提出者≠ | Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (Leiden University) | Henry Small |
| 类型≠ | Bibliometric mapping technique | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | VOSviewer science mapping, bibliometric science mapping with VOSviewer, VOS-based science mapping, VOSviewer network mapping | co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | VOSviewer-assisted science mapping uses the VOSviewer software — developed at Leiden University — to construct and visualize bibliometric networks from publication metadata. It applies the VOS (Visualization of Similarities) mapping technique to reveal intellectual structures in a research field: co-authorship networks, citation landscapes, keyword clusters, and thematic frontiers, all rendered as interactive, color-coded network maps that expose how concepts, authors, and journals are relationally positioned within a discipline. | Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|