ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Vignette Experiment×Conjoint Survey Experiment×
领域Political SciencePolitical Science
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2014
提出者Survey and social-psychological research traditionsJens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei Yamamoto
类型Randomized experiment using short described scenariosMulti-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimands
开创性文献Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research. Methodology, 6(3), 128–138. DOI ↗Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗
别名Vignette study, Experimental vignette, Scenario experiment, Text-vignette experimentCausal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experiment
相关34
摘要A vignette experiment presents respondents with a short, carefully constructed description of a person, situation, or scenario — a vignette — in which one or more features are experimentally manipulated, and then asks for a judgment, attitude, or intended action. By randomizing which version of the scenario each respondent reads, the researcher isolates the causal effect of each manipulated feature on the elicited judgment, combining the realism of a concrete scenario with the causal leverage of an experiment.A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Vignette Experiment · Conjoint Survey Experiment. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare