方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Vertical Scaling× | 项目反应理论 (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | Education | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2014 | 1952–1968 |
| 提出者≠ | Educational measurement tradition (Thurstone; Kolen & Brennan synthesis) | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| 类型≠ | Construction of a single developmental score scale spanning multiple grades | Probabilistic measurement model |
| 开创性文献≠ | Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 9781493903160 | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Developmental Scaling, Vertical Linking, Cross-Grade Scaling, Growth Scale Construction | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Vertical scaling places tests written for different grade levels onto a single continuous score scale so that growth from one grade to the next can be measured in common units. Unlike horizontal equating, which links alternate forms intended to be interchangeable, vertical scaling deliberately links tests of differing difficulty and content to build a developmental continuum spanning, for example, grades 3 through 8. It is the measurement foundation that lets a fourth-grade and a fifth-grade score be subtracted to express how much a student grew. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|