ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

三角半结构化访谈×焦点小组研究×半结构化访谈×主题分析×
领域调查方法论质性质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Formalized in practice from the late 1970s onward1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s2006
提出者Synthesized from Norman K. Denzin (triangulation) and H. Russell Bernard (semi-structured interviewing)Robert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. KruegerRobert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar KvaleVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative data collection techniqueQualitative data collection methodQualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名triangulated qualitative interview, multi-source semi-structured interview, triangulated in-depth interview, convergent interview strategyfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırmasıguided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSITA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关3663
摘要A triangulated semi-structured interview strategy combines the flexibility of open-ended, guided interviewing with deliberate triangulation across multiple informant groups, data sources, or interview occasions. By applying the same semi-structured protocol to different participant perspectives — such as clients, providers, and managers — or by pairing interviews with documents and observations, the approach cross-validates emerging themes and reduces the risk that any single viewpoint dominates the findings. The result is richer, more credible qualitative data than a single-source interview study can deliver.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Triangulated Semi-structured Interview · Focus Group · Semi-Structured Interview · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare