方法对比

	时间切片引文分析	共被引分析
领域	科学计量学	文献计量学
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1955–1965 (foundational); temporal slicing formalized in scientometrics from the 1980s onward	1973
提出者	Eugene Garfield (citation analysis foundation); Derek J. de Solla Price (temporal/longitudinal framing)	Henry Small
类型	Quantitative scientometric technique	Method
开创性文献	Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.	Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
别名	temporal citation analysis, longitudinal citation analysis, time-window citation analysis, diachronic citation analysis	co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
相关	6	5
摘要	Time-sliced citation analysis partitions a body of literature into sequential temporal windows — for example, five-year intervals — and performs citation analysis within and across each window. This reveals how citation patterns, influential papers, and knowledge flows shift over time, providing a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual evolution rather than a static aggregate snapshot.	Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.