方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Think-Aloud Protocol in Education× | Formative Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Education | Education |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1993 | 1998 |
| 提出者≠ | K. Anders Ericsson & Herbert Simon; educational application by Leighton and others | Scriven (term); Bloom; Black & Wiliam (modern synthesis) |
| 类型≠ | Verbal-report method for eliciting cognitive processes during tasks | Instructional process using evidence of learning to adapt teaching and feedback |
| 开创性文献≠ | Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (Revised ed.). MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262550239 | Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Verbal Protocol Analysis in Education, Cognitive Labs, Talk-Aloud Method, Concurrent Verbal Reporting | Assessment for Learning, Classroom Formative Assessment, Feedback-Based Assessment, Embedded Formative Assessment |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The think-aloud protocol is a method for making cognition visible by having people verbalize their thoughts while performing a task. In education it is the primary tool for studying response processes — how students actually read, reason about, and answer test items and learning tasks. Grounded in Ericsson and Simon's theory of verbal reports as data, it provides the response-process evidence that modern validity frameworks require, revealing whether items measure the intended thinking, and exposing strategies, misconceptions, and construct-irrelevant difficulties. | Formative assessment, or assessment for learning, is the practice of gathering evidence of student understanding during instruction and using it immediately to adjust teaching and to give feedback that moves learning forward. Unlike summative assessment, which measures learning after the fact for grading or accountability, formative assessment is woven into the teaching cycle. Synthesized influentially by Black and Wiliam, it is defined not by the type of instrument but by whether the resulting evidence actually changes subsequent instruction and learning. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|