方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 理论域框架 (TDF)× | 规范化过程理论 (NPT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 实施科学 | 实施科学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2005 | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., et al. | May, C. R. |
| 类型 | Framework | Framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(1), 26-33. DOI ↗ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | TDF, theoretical domains, behaviour change framework | NPT, normalization theory, routinization |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a 14-domain model that integrates constructs from 33 behavior change and implementation theories to identify barriers and facilitators to professional and public behavior change. Developed by Michie et al. (2005) to provide a practical tool for implementation scientists and behavior change specialists, the TDF helps systematically assess 'why' healthcare professionals or patients do (or do not) adopt evidence-based practices, and guides the design of tailored behavior change interventions. | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|