ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

理论域框架 (TDF)×实施研究综合框架 (CFIR)×
领域实施科学实施科学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20052009
提出者Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., et al.Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., et al.
类型FrameworkFramework
开创性文献Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(1), 26-33. DOI ↗Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowson, E. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. DOI ↗
别名TDF, theoretical domains, behaviour change frameworkCFIR, CFIR model, consolidated framework
相关55
摘要The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a 14-domain model that integrates constructs from 33 behavior change and implementation theories to identify barriers and facilitators to professional and public behavior change. Developed by Michie et al. (2005) to provide a practical tool for implementation scientists and behavior change specialists, the TDF helps systematically assess 'why' healthcare professionals or patients do (or do not) adopt evidence-based practices, and guides the design of tailored behavior change interventions.The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a five-domain model designed to systematically evaluate the factors influencing implementation success of evidence-based interventions in health systems. Developed by Damschroder et al. (2009) and refined through extensive use across health domains, CFIR provides a structured vocabulary and taxonomy of 39 constructs that identify implementation barriers and facilitators across intervention characteristics, organizational context, individual factors, and implementation process.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Theoretical Domains Framework · Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare