方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 教学有效性量表× | 学生投入度量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 教育心理学 | 教育心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1982 | 2004 |
| 提出者≠ | Herbert Marsh | Jennifer Fredricks, Phyllis Blumenfeld, Alison Paris |
| 类型≠ | Teacher effectiveness rating scale | Multidimensional engagement assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 77-95. DOI ↗ | Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | TES, Instructor Effectiveness Rating | SES, Academic Engagement Measure |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Teaching Effectiveness Scale (TES) is a validated instrument designed to measure students' perceptions of instructor effectiveness across multiple dimensions. The most widely known version, the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ), developed by Marsh (1982), assesses nine dimensions of teaching including learning value, enthusiasm, organization, group interaction, and course difficulty, providing comprehensive feedback on instructor performance. | The Student Engagement Scale (SES) measures the extent to which students are actively involved in academic and social aspects of school or university life. Grounded in Fredricks et al.'s multidimensional framework, the instrument assesses behavioral engagement (participation, attendance, effort), emotional engagement (interest, belonging, enthusiasm), and cognitive engagement (mental effort, deep thinking, persistence). High engagement is consistently associated with better learning outcomes and well-being. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|