ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

摆动权重法×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19862010
提出者von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Weight_Subjective (swing from worst to best, relative gain assessment)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press ISBN: 978-0521271073Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要SWING (Swing Weighting — importance weights derived from worst-to-best swing utility gains) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SWING · ARAS. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare