ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

步骤权重评估比率分析×AHPSort×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份201020122010
提出者Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Sequential step-ratio subjective weightingAHP-based sorting with limiting or central profilesAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management DOI ↗Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关888
摘要SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHPSORT (AHPSort — AHP-based classification of alternatives into ordered categories) is a sorting multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SWARA · AHPSORT · ARAS. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare