ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Support for Political Violence Measure×Affective Polarization Measurement×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Latent structureProcess / pipeline
起源年份20222012
提出者Nathan Kalmoe & Lilliana MasonShanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood & Yphtach Lelkes
类型Attitude scale for endorsement of partisan violenceComposite survey index
开创性文献Kalmoe, N. P., & Mason, L. (2022). Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226820286Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. DOI ↗
别名Lethal Partisanship Scale, Support for Partisan Violence Battery, Kalmoe-Mason Political Violence Items, Radical Partisanship MeasureAffective Polarization Index, Partisan Affect Gap, Thermometer Difference Measure
相关34
摘要This measure assesses citizens' willingness to endorse violence against political opponents, a key indicator of democratic fragility. Nathan Kalmoe and Lilliana Mason's research, synthesized in Radical American Partisanship (2022), maps a continuum of violent partisan hostility from wishing harm on the other side to endorsing lethal attacks, using representative surveys and embedded behavioral experiments. Because such attitudes are rare and the items are extreme, the measure has prompted vigorous methodological debate, exemplified by Westwood and colleagues' demonstration that inattentive responding and item design can substantially inflate apparent support, making bias correction central to credible estimates.Affective polarization measurement quantifies the gap between how positively people feel toward their own political party (the in-party) and how negatively they feel toward the opposing party (the out-party). Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes (2012) showed that this affective divide has grown sharply even where issue positions have not, reframing polarization as a social-identity phenomenon of partisan like and dislike rather than ideological distance.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Support for Political Violence Measure · Affective Polarization Measurement. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare