ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

SPJ Framework×暴力风险评估指南 (VRAG)×
领域司法心理学司法心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20031993
提出者Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. LawsGrant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey
类型Clinician-SynthesizedClinician-rated / File-based
开创性文献Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link ↗Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗
别名SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ FrameworkVRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG
相关44
摘要The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SPJ Framework · VRAG. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare