ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

SPJ Framework×LSI-R:服务水平调查表-修订版×
领域司法心理学司法心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20031995
提出者Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. LawsD. A. Andrews, James Bonta
类型Clinician-SynthesizedInterview-based / File-based
开创性文献Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link ↗Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Department of Psychology, Carleton University. link ↗
别名SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ FrameworkLSI-R, LSI-R-SV, Andrews-Bonta Risk Assessment
相关44
摘要The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) is a 54-item assessment instrument developed by Andrews and Bonta (1995) to measure offender risk level and criminogenic needs (dynamic risk factors related to criminal behavior) in criminal justice populations. It is grounded in the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and is widely used in correctional facilities, probation/parole services, and forensic settings to inform release decisions, supervision intensity, treatment prioritization, and rehabilitation planning.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: SPJ Framework · LSI-R. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare