ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

结构性断点Toda-Yamamoto因果检验×结构性断点向量自回归模型×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1995 (base); structural break extensions widely adopted 2000s–2010s1980–1998
提出者Toda & Yamamoto (1995); structural break extensions by Zivot & Andrews (1992) and subsequent applied literatureBai & Perron (structural breaks); Sims (VAR framework)
类型Causality testMultivariate time series model with regime change
开创性文献Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66(1), 47–78. DOI ↗
别名SB-TY causality, structural break modified Wald test causality, Fourier Toda-Yamamoto causality, causality with regime shiftsVAR with structural breaks, break-point VAR, regime-switching VAR, SB-VAR
相关66
摘要The structural break Toda-Yamamoto causality test extends the standard Toda-Yamamoto modified Wald (MWALD) procedure to accommodate one or more structural breaks in the time series. By identifying break dates first and then including dummy variables in the augmented VAR, the test maintains its valid asymptotic chi-squared distribution regardless of the integration or cointegration order of the variables, even in the presence of regime shifts.The Structural Break VAR model extends the standard Vector Autoregression (VAR) framework by allowing coefficient matrices and error covariance to shift at one or more unknown break dates. It is designed for multivariate time series where economic relationships change abruptly due to policy shifts, financial crises, or major structural events.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Structural Break Toda-Yamamoto Causality · Structural Break VAR Model. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare