ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

结构性断点Toda-Yamamoto因果检验×格兰杰因果检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1995 (base); structural break extensions widely adopted 2000s–2010s1969
提出者Toda & Yamamoto (1995); structural break extensions by Zivot & Andrews (1992) and subsequent applied literatureClive W. J. Granger
类型Causality testCausality test (F-test on VAR)
开创性文献Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. DOI ↗
别名SB-TY causality, structural break modified Wald test causality, Fourier Toda-Yamamoto causality, causality with regime shiftsGranger test, GC test, predictive causality test, Granger non-causality test
相关65
摘要The structural break Toda-Yamamoto causality test extends the standard Toda-Yamamoto modified Wald (MWALD) procedure to accommodate one or more structural breaks in the time series. By identifying break dates first and then including dummy variables in the augmented VAR, the test maintains its valid asymptotic chi-squared distribution regardless of the integration or cointegration order of the variables, even in the presence of regime shifts.The Granger causality test is a statistical hypothesis test that determines whether past values of one time series help predict future values of another, beyond what that series' own past already explains. Introduced by Clive Granger in 1969, it is the standard approach for assessing predictive causality in VAR-based time-series analysis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Structural Break Toda-Yamamoto Causality · Granger Causality Test. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare