方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 空间回归不连续设计 (Spatial RDD)× | 因果推断的工具变量(IV)方法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 卫生经济学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010s | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 提出者≠ | Popularized by Dell (2010); formalized for geographic boundaries by Keele & Titiunik (2015) | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 类型≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Dell, M. (2010). The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863-1903. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Spatial RDD, Geographic RDD, Border RD Design, Geographic Discontinuity Design | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design uses a geographic or administrative boundary as the threshold that assigns units to treatment. Observations just inside one side of the boundary are compared with those just outside it, exploiting the near-random variation in treatment status near the cutoff to recover a local causal effect. The approach is widely used in economics, political science, and public health when policies or institutions change sharply at a border. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|