方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 简式效度检验× | 构念效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1955 |
| 提出者≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evaluation framework |
| 开创性文献 | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|