方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 简式量表内容效度× | 构念效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1995–2000 | 1955 |
| 提出者≠ | Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards) | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| 类型≠ | Validity evaluation | Validity evaluation framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|