ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

简版构念效度×构念效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1990s–2000s1955
提出者Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteriaLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
类型Validity assessment / scale shorteningValidity evaluation framework
开创性文献Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
别名abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validationconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
相关66
摘要Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Short form construct validity · Construct Validity. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare