方法对比

	Box-Behnken设计中的敏感性分析	响应面方法 (RSM)
领域	实验设计	实验设计
方法族	Process / pipeline	Hypothesis test
起源年份	1960 (BBD); sensitivity integration formalized 2000s–2010s	1951
提出者	Box & Behnken (design, 1960); Saltelli et al. (sensitivity framework, 2000s)	George E. P. Box & K. B. Wilson
类型	Integrated experimental-design and sensitivity-analysis technique	Second-order polynomial response surface model
开创性文献	Box, G. E. P., & Behnken, D. W. (1960). Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2(4), 455–475.	Box, G. E. P. & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
别名	SA-BBD, Box-Behnken sensitivity analysis, BBD with sensitivity analysis, sensitivity-augmented Box-Behnken design	RSM, Central Composite Design, Box-Behnken Design, CCD
相关	5	7
摘要	Sensitivity analysis with Box-Behnken design combines a resource-efficient three-level response surface experiment with a systematic assessment of how much each input factor drives variation in the response. The Box-Behnken design (BBD) fits a second-order polynomial model using fewer runs than a full central composite design, while the overlaid sensitivity analysis quantifies each factor's relative influence — helping engineers and researchers distinguish the vital few drivers from the inconsequential many.	Response Surface Methodology is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques for building an empirical second-order polynomial model that relates a continuous response variable to two or more controllable input factors, and then locating the factor settings that optimize that response. The approach was introduced by George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson in their landmark 1951 paper and has since become a cornerstone of process optimization across engineering, chemistry, food science, and pharmaceutics.