方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 教育研究中因果关系的敏感性分析× | 回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1983–2002 | 2008 |
| 提出者≠ | Paul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and others | Imbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction) |
| 类型≠ | Causal robustness / bias assessment | Quasi-experimental causal design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studies | RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings. | Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|