ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教育研究中因果关系的敏感性分析×回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983–20022008
提出者Paul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and othersImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
类型Causal robustness / bias assessmentQuasi-experimental causal design
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
别名Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studiesRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
相关65
摘要Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research · Regression Discontinuity. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare