ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定性研究中的数据饱和×焦点小组法×
领域质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671956
提出者Barney Glaser and Anselm StraussRobert K. Merton and Paul F. Lazarsfeld
类型ConceptMethod
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302560Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366
别名saturation, theoretical saturation, thematic saturation, sampling to saturationFGD, focus group discussion, group interview
相关44
摘要Data saturation is a foundational principle in qualitative research describing the point at which data collection yields no new themes, codes, or insights—additional data becomes redundant. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss (1967) in their work on grounded theory, saturation guides decisions about sample size and when to stop recruiting participants. Saturation is not a fixed number but a dynamic endpoint determined by examining whether new data are adding substantively new information. The concept is central to claims of rigor and theoretical adequacy in qualitative research, signaling that the researcher has gathered sufficient data to understand the phenomenon in depth.Focus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Data Saturation in Qualitative Research · Focus Group Methodology. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare