ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

岩体分类×岩石薄片分析×
领域地球科学地球科学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19741858
提出者Bieniawski and BartonHenry Clifton Sorby
类型engineering geology assessment pipelinecompositional characterization pipeline
开创性文献Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗Tucker, M. E. (2003). Sedimentary Rocks in the Field: A Color Guide (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
别名RMR system, Q-system classification, rock quality designationmicroscopy analysis, thin section analysis, modal composition determination
相关45
摘要Rock mass classification is the systematic assessment of rock quality and mechanical behavior in engineering geology, combining field observations of jointing, weathering, and strength into a numerical index. Pioneered by Bieniawski (RMR system, 1974) and Barton (Q-system, 1974), these methods enable rapid site assessment and guide design of excavations, dams, and slopes. Classification bridges the gap between small laboratory samples and large field-scale behavior.Petrographic analysis is the microscopic examination of rock thin sections to determine mineral composition, grain size, texture, and diagenetic alteration. Pioneered by Sorby in 1858, this method remains the gold standard for understanding lithology and has evolved to include quantitative image analysis and cathodoluminescence. Petrographic data anchor well-log interpretation, validate seismic velocity models, and constrain paleoenvironmental and diagenetic histories.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Rock Mass Classification · Petrographic Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare