ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健的 nomological validity (鲁棒的 nomological validity)×结构方程模型×
领域心理测量学研究统计学
方法族Latent structureProcess / pipeline
起源年份19551921
提出者Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and CampbellSewall Wright
类型Validity assessment / construct validationMethod
开创性文献Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1973). LISREL: A general computer program for estimating a linear structural equation system. Research Bulletin 73-5. University of Stockholm. link ↗
别名nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNVSEM, path analysis, latent variable modeling, causal modeling
相关53
摘要Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning.Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a comprehensive statistical framework combining path analysis (Sewall Wright, 1921) and confirmatory factor analysis to test complex causal models linking observed and latent variables. Formalized by Jöreskog (1973) with LISREL software, SEM enables simultaneous estimation of measurement relationships (how variables measure latent constructs) and structural relationships (how constructs influence outcomes), making it powerful for theory testing in psychology, epidemiology, organizational research, and health sciences where complex mediation, moderation, and latent processes require integrated analysis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Nomological Validity · Structural Equation Modeling. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare