方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 稳健的 nomological validity (鲁棒的 nomological validity)× | 构念效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份 | 1955 | 1955 |
| 提出者≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evaluation framework |
| 开创性文献 | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|