ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健模型检验研究×路径分析×
领域研究设计统计学
方法族Process / pipelineLatent structure
起源年份1988–19981921
提出者Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler; Ke-Hai YuanSewall Wright
类型Quantitative model-testing research design with robust estimationCausal / mediation model
开创性文献Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20(7), 557–585. link ↗
别名robust SEM, robust structural model testing, robust fit evaluation, robust model evaluation researchPA, path coefficient analysis, observed-variable SEM, causal path modeling
相关65
摘要Robust model testing research applies structural or path models to data while explicitly accounting for violations of multivariate normality and other distributional assumptions. Rather than discarding non-normal data or forcing transformations, it uses corrected estimators — most notably the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square and Yuan-Bentler robust standard errors — to produce trustworthy fit indices and parameter estimates even when classical maximum likelihood assumptions are breached.Path analysis tests a researcher-specified causal diagram among observed variables by decomposing their intercorrelations into direct effects, indirect (mediated) effects, and spurious associations. Developed by Sewall Wright in 1921, it is the observed-variable special case of structural equation modeling and remains a standard tool for theory-driven multivariate causal inference.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Model Testing Research · Path Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare