ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健模型检验研究×验证性因子分析(CFA)×
领域研究设计心理测量学
方法族Process / pipelineLatent structure
起源年份1988–19981969
提出者Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler; Ke-Hai YuanKarl Gustav Jöreskog
类型Quantitative model-testing research design with robust estimationHypothesis-testing latent variable model
开创性文献Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
别名robust SEM, robust structural model testing, robust fit evaluation, robust model evaluation researchCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
相关64
摘要Robust model testing research applies structural or path models to data while explicitly accounting for violations of multivariate normality and other distributional assumptions. Rather than discarding non-normal data or forcing transformations, it uses corrected estimators — most notably the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square and Yuan-Bentler robust standard errors — to produce trustworthy fit indices and parameter estimates even when classical maximum likelihood assumptions are breached.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Model Testing Research · Confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare