ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

稳健效应量分析×稳健独立样本t检验×
领域统计学统计学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份2005 (formalized)1974–1990s
提出者Algina, Keselman & Penfield; WilcoxRand R. Wilcox; Karen K. Yuen (trimmed-mean form)
类型Robust effect size estimationRobust parametric mean comparison
开创性文献Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328. DOI ↗Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (3rd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0123869838
别名robust Cohen's d, trimmed-mean effect size, outlier-resistant effect size, robust standardized mean differenceYuen's t-test, trimmed-mean t-test, Winsorized t-test, robust two-sample test
相关52
摘要Robust effect size analysis quantifies the magnitude of a difference or association using estimators that are resistant to outliers and violations of normality. Rather than relying on classical statistics such as Cohen's d based on sample means and standard deviations, robust variants use trimmed means and Winsorized standard deviations to produce effect size estimates that accurately reflect the typical effect rather than being inflated by extreme values.The robust independent samples t-test compares the central tendency of two independent groups using trimmed means and Winsorized variances, making it substantially less sensitive to outliers and non-normality than the classical Student or Welch t-test. The most widely used form is Yuen's test, which also accommodates unequal variances across groups.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Robust Effect Size Analysis · Robust independent samples t-test. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare