方法对比

	基于风险的响应面方法	中心复合设计
领域	实验设计	实验设计
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1990s–2000s (risk-based extensions)	1951
提出者	Builds on Box & Wilson (1951) RSM; risk integration formalized in engineering reliability literature from the 1990s onward	George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson
类型	Experimental optimization with probabilistic risk constraints	Response surface experimental design
开创性文献	Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0470174463	Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45.
别名	Risk-based RSM, reliability-based RSM, probabilistic RSM, risk-integrated response surface methodology	CCD, Box-Wilson design, central composite response surface design, rotatable central composite design
相关	5	3
摘要	Risk-based Response Surface Methodology (Risk-based RSM) extends classical RSM by embedding probabilistic risk or reliability constraints into the experimental optimization process. Rather than seeking a single optimal point under deterministic conditions, it identifies factor settings that achieve performance goals while keeping the probability of failure or unacceptable outcomes below a specified threshold — making it especially valuable in safety-critical and high-variability engineering contexts.	Central Composite Design (CCD) is a second-order response surface design that allows researchers to efficiently fit a full quadratic model relating multiple continuous input factors to one or more response variables. Introduced by Box and Wilson in 1951, it combines a factorial (or fractional factorial) core, axial (star) points, and center-point replicates into a single unified design, making it the most widely used design for process optimization in engineering, chemistry, and manufacturing.