ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

风险调整 Cox 比例风险模型×倾向得分匹配×
领域流行病学研究统计学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1972 (Cox model); risk adjustment widespread from 1980s1983
提出者D. R. Cox (base model); risk-adjustment as routine practice formalised through clinical epidemiology literature from the 1980s onwardPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
类型Multivariable survival regressionMethod
开创性文献Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
别名adjusted Cox regression, multivariable Cox model, covariate-adjusted survival analysis, risk-adjusted survival modelPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
相关53
摘要Risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression extends the classical Cox (1972) survival model by simultaneously entering known confounders — age, sex, comorbidities, disease severity — into the model alongside the exposure of primary interest. This adjustment isolates the independent effect of the exposure on the hazard of an event, producing hazard ratios (HRs) that are not distorted by baseline differences between comparison groups. It is the most widely used method for multivariable survival analysis in clinical and epidemiological research.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards · Propensity Score Matching. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare